Which factor is NOT considered for bidder disqualification?

The reason for the choice of completing projects on time as a factor NOT considered for bidder disqualification lies in the principles of fair evaluation in the procurement process. Generally, a contractor's ability to complete projects on time is viewed positively and is often a criterion for determining a bidder's reliability and capability.

In contrast, prior negative experience, which may involve unsatisfactory performance or a history of not meeting contract terms, can indeed be grounds for disqualification. If a bidder has faced issues in the past, it raises concerns about their future performance.

Mitigating factors refer to circumstances that might lessen the severity of prior negative experiences and are also considered in evaluations, allowing for a more nuanced approach to assessing a bidder's reliability. Written notice to the bidder, while a procedural aspect of communication, can serve an important role in the process but does not typically factor into the criteria directly impacting disqualification.

Therefore, completing projects on time is seen as a strength and not a reason for disqualification, highlighting the proactive nature of managing bidding processes in contracting.